← Back to context Comment by elnatro 7 hours ago Not have to do it in the first place because of automated controls and fail-safes? 5 comments elnatro Reply embedding-shape 7 hours ago Sure, but in this case, those don't have exist and you need to make a tough choice, so which is it? elnatro 7 hours ago Not having fail-safes is the issue itself. embedding-shape 6 hours ago So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now. 1 reply → 1718627440 2 hours ago The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism.
embedding-shape 7 hours ago Sure, but in this case, those don't have exist and you need to make a tough choice, so which is it? elnatro 7 hours ago Not having fail-safes is the issue itself. embedding-shape 6 hours ago So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now. 1 reply → 1718627440 2 hours ago The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism.
elnatro 7 hours ago Not having fail-safes is the issue itself. embedding-shape 6 hours ago So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now. 1 reply → 1718627440 2 hours ago The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism.
embedding-shape 6 hours ago So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now. 1 reply →
Sure, but in this case, those don't have exist and you need to make a tough choice, so which is it?
Not having fail-safes is the issue itself.
So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now.
1 reply →
The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism.