← Back to context Comment by knorker 8 hours ago Oh, no vector extension. Probably a dealbreaker for me. 4 comments knorker Reply akshitgaur2005 8 hours ago why? 6SixTy 8 minutes ago RISC-V Vector is roughly equivalent to MMX, SSE, and AVX. A lot of tasks without those instructions are flat out slower without. knorker 1 hour ago The difference in performance in the kind of compute workloads I'm interested in are so improved by SIMD/Vector that there isn't even any point evaluating non-RVV hardware. stinkbeetle 7 hours ago Well Linux distros are consolidating around RVA23 target, for one thing (I'm not OP).
akshitgaur2005 8 hours ago why? 6SixTy 8 minutes ago RISC-V Vector is roughly equivalent to MMX, SSE, and AVX. A lot of tasks without those instructions are flat out slower without. knorker 1 hour ago The difference in performance in the kind of compute workloads I'm interested in are so improved by SIMD/Vector that there isn't even any point evaluating non-RVV hardware. stinkbeetle 7 hours ago Well Linux distros are consolidating around RVA23 target, for one thing (I'm not OP).
6SixTy 8 minutes ago RISC-V Vector is roughly equivalent to MMX, SSE, and AVX. A lot of tasks without those instructions are flat out slower without.
knorker 1 hour ago The difference in performance in the kind of compute workloads I'm interested in are so improved by SIMD/Vector that there isn't even any point evaluating non-RVV hardware.
stinkbeetle 7 hours ago Well Linux distros are consolidating around RVA23 target, for one thing (I'm not OP).
why?
RISC-V Vector is roughly equivalent to MMX, SSE, and AVX. A lot of tasks without those instructions are flat out slower without.
The difference in performance in the kind of compute workloads I'm interested in are so improved by SIMD/Vector that there isn't even any point evaluating non-RVV hardware.
Well Linux distros are consolidating around RVA23 target, for one thing (I'm not OP).