Comment by hexbin010
7 hours ago
Awesome! Fully tested? QA'd? No false positives etc?
I wouldn't want to hassle customers who have fully paid up accounts
7 hours ago
Awesome! Fully tested? QA'd? No false positives etc?
I wouldn't want to hassle customers who have fully paid up accounts
Everything is still touched by human - AI is just giving suggestions to humans to speed them up. Can get them 80-90% there.
I think also you need to compare it to what was already there. No QA on the humans. Done off the side of their desk with no oversite, process, or checking. Huge amounts of manual errors.
The new solution just needs to be better than the old one, it doesn't need to be perfect.
(But I 100% agree that I wouldn't let AI live against customers. It is helping us build automations faster, and doing a "little" thinking on recommendation rules that would be very hard to implement without something highly structured, which would be frankly impossible in our environment.)
> I think also you need to compare it to what was already there
No. The bar is "miracle" and can cure cancer etc and can replace all developers etc. The bar is much higher than existing manual processes. It absolutely needs to be perfection to match the lofty claims
Miracle was meant here "figuratively", esp for non tech people this wording seems plausible from their perspective, because they can now do that without dev support
Nobody told them?!?
I guess Vibe coding cleanup firms and offensive security researchers are plotting to find bugs costing firms millions of dollars worth of bugs or one creating a dreadful data breach.