← Back to context

Comment by pjmlp

15 hours ago

Huawei took control of its own destiny instead of relying on Google forks.

https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/design/

https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/harmonyos/develop/

And I am still sad that they didn't go for an open source hard fork of AOSP. Would have been fun.

Indeed and if Google would pull the plug on AOSP, some initiative like this would become the de facto Android standard.

  • I love your optimism. What you'll see is return to 2000s where you may have had "Symbian" as the operating system, but the phones weren't compatible between themselves and apps broke and didn't work across manufacturers (or even product lines) because there was noone enforcing compatibility.

    I wonder if you forgot that or you're too young to remember what kind of bizarre hell mobile development was at that time.

    Heck, even early Android was really hard to develop for because CTS suite didn't cover enough and all of us spent hours upon hours (and many dollars) trying to reproduce and fix Samsung, Huawei, HTC and other bugs.

    • I never said it's going to be smoother than it is right now, just that Google will lose control.

      8 of the top 10 manufacturers are Chinese, the last two are Samsung (which definitely isn't going to side with Google) ... and Google themselves.

      If Google doesn't publish AOSP anymore, Pixels will be the only phone with their software on it, Samsung might attempt something alone and the rest will pick up the development from a Chinese government consortium which will be the de-facto default mobile platform instead of the Google one.

  • I doubt that people advocating for GrapheneOS would pivot to a Chinese powered platform.

    • They would have to follow like everybody else, they aren't powerful enough to dictate market trends.

      8 out of the top 10 Android manufacturers are Chinese.

      Google would just lose the ownership of Android to a Chinese consortium used by everybody else.