← Back to context

Comment by snow_flake

8 hours ago

The phys.org article and headlines are misleading, the authors did not investigate systems to actually transmit torque. From what I gather, the interesting findings are the parameters for co-rotation and counterrotation of the driving and driven cylinder, depending on the Reynolds number, distance and so on. To illustrate one of the images of their publication: https://i.imgur.com/m8P2iVw.png

That would make much more sense then what the article seems to imply (scientists reinvent a 100 year old torque converter! But worse!!). Of course that headline isn't nearly as fun (scientists develop better model for fluid dynamics in torque converter).

Can someone suggest a better (i.e. more accurate and neutral) title?

  • Mapping out How Fluid Mechanical Spin-coupling Interactions Depend on Proximity, Confinement, and Flow State

    Alternate: New Ways to Understand, Control, and Exploit Hydrodynamic Spin-spin Interactions in Applications

    The article doesn't really deliver on either headline, but that's the fault of the article, not the study.

    • The limit is 80 chars and I'm not sure how to squeeze those in. I've taken a crack at something simpler in the title above. Does it work?