← Back to context Comment by akshitgaur2005 1 month ago why? 4 comments akshitgaur2005 Reply stinkbeetle 1 month ago Well Linux distros are consolidating around RVA23 target, for one thing (I'm not OP). knorker 1 month ago The difference in performance in the kind of compute workloads I'm interested in are so improved by SIMD/Vector that there isn't even any point evaluating non-RVV hardware. 6SixTy 1 month ago RISC-V Vector is roughly equivalent to MMX, SSE, and AVX. A lot of tasks without those instructions are flat out slower without. akshitgaur2005 23 days ago Ahh, I read that as "Oh no, vector extension" my bad
stinkbeetle 1 month ago Well Linux distros are consolidating around RVA23 target, for one thing (I'm not OP).
knorker 1 month ago The difference in performance in the kind of compute workloads I'm interested in are so improved by SIMD/Vector that there isn't even any point evaluating non-RVV hardware.
6SixTy 1 month ago RISC-V Vector is roughly equivalent to MMX, SSE, and AVX. A lot of tasks without those instructions are flat out slower without. akshitgaur2005 23 days ago Ahh, I read that as "Oh no, vector extension" my bad
Well Linux distros are consolidating around RVA23 target, for one thing (I'm not OP).
The difference in performance in the kind of compute workloads I'm interested in are so improved by SIMD/Vector that there isn't even any point evaluating non-RVV hardware.
RISC-V Vector is roughly equivalent to MMX, SSE, and AVX. A lot of tasks without those instructions are flat out slower without.
Ahh, I read that as "Oh no, vector extension" my bad