← Back to context

Comment by wavefunction

6 hours ago

I was curious and I assume you're referring to Nathan Mayer Rothschild, who died in 1836* from an abscess. These need to be drained, antibiotics are not enough to guarantee treatment outcome. And humans have been treating abscesses successfully since at least the iron age.

No offense intended but The Economist is very low-quality.

*edited year of death

What do you consider high quality? I would say they are one of the higher quality news papers of the world. Not everything, but overall yes.

I do not agree with their political views, but I can say the same about most papers. To a large degree this site is also beginning to be troublesome politically.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild probably died of staphylococcal or streptococcal septicaemia, either from the abscess or secondary contamination from the surgeon’s knife. Today that infection would almost certainly be cured with standard antibiotics.

No offence intended but wavefunction is very low-quality.