← Back to context

Comment by metalman

1 month ago

while I aplaud the very well thought out and implimented design for a computer interface (it has very strong space ship vibes) there is a fundamental flaw in the premise, in that ergonomics implys some optimisation of the physical(cardio) effort(impact, strain) and comfort of useing a tool, which is impossible while hunched over a static device making very small partial body movements. So this set up will very likely optimise well for speed run missions,but the cost will actualy be greater pressure and strain on a persons body overall, and the only answer for that is to fully detach, relax, exercise, and rest between missions.

I've never seen ergonomics, or the subset of the field known as physical ergonomics defined this way. Can I ask where you found this interpretation?