← Back to context

Comment by TheAceOfHearts

1 month ago

That is one of the worst clanker-brained replies I have ever read on this platform.

The OP you're replying to made a concrete point (X claim to be transparent but block researcher access through unreasonably price gating), and you didn't even attempt to refute it nor engage with the substance of the post at all.

If you think that this evidence is so compelling why don't you link to some sources and summarize it in your own words? If you cannot be bothered to do that much, why are you replying in the first place?

Telling someone that they're wrong and they should just chat with an LLM to educate themselves removes any room for discussion, leaving this platform and other comment readers worse off.