Comment by eikenberry

I'm talking about original, greenfield projects that was entirely written by an AI agent. There is no source material here beyond the agent and prompting. Prompting, AFAIK, hasn't been considered sufficient to make it a human produced work.

Or are you getting at the idea that the works the AI was originally trained on could still be considered an original work the generated code was derived from? Like if the generate code happens to look like someones code in github, that they could sue? I'm not 100% on sources here but I thought this was already tested in court and ruled it wasn't infringement.