I think there's an unprecedented level of lawbreaking and disregard for consequences by this administration. So far they haven't been held to account, it remains to be seen if they ever will.
> Shapiro also revealed that despite prior assertions in court, SSA’s DOGE team members “were using links to share data through the third-party server ‘Cloudflare.’”
Wreckless incompetence at the highest levels of government.
Not only will there be no punitive action taken by this admin, but I fully expect Trump to extend the current flurry of lame-duck pardons to most if not all members of his administration, for any and all actions they may have taken, before his term is out.
I hope I’m wrong, but in his 5 years as President he has yet to display any hint of restraint or ethical compass, so I would be very surprised if this doesn’t happen.
Because the headline underplays it quite a bit the actual story here is that the Social Security Administration has referred two DOGE employees for Hatch Act violations after discovering contacts with a political group seeking SSA data to overturn election results.
I think there's an unprecedented level of lawbreaking and disregard for consequences by this administration. So far they haven't been held to account, it remains to be seen if they ever will.
> Shapiro also revealed that despite prior assertions in court, SSA’s DOGE team members “were using links to share data through the third-party server ‘Cloudflare.’”
Wreckless incompetence at the highest levels of government.
Wreckless incompetence at the highest levels of government
You mean reckless incompetence. There was plenty of wrecking.
Wow this is bad. Will there be any accountability?
According to the OSC:
https://osc.gov/Documents/Public%20Files/Press%20Release/OSC...
Violations are sent to the President for disciplinary action.
So, no.
Which in practice means he has (more) lackeys loyal to him on pain of criminal prosecution.
> Will there be any accountability?
FTA: "SSA referred both DOGE employees for potential violations of the Hatch Act."
Probably nothing under this administration. But there is a paper trail–now cited in public–for folks in the future to pursue.
In the meantime, I'm curious what civil damages they may be liable for.
Not only will there be no punitive action taken by this admin, but I fully expect Trump to extend the current flurry of lame-duck pardons to most if not all members of his administration, for any and all actions they may have taken, before his term is out.
I hope I’m wrong, but in his 5 years as President he has yet to display any hint of restraint or ethical compass, so I would be very surprised if this doesn’t happen.
EDIT: “to punitive action” => “no punitive action”
3 replies →
Pam Bondi's already tasked with assembling a crack team of WWW legal interns to gaslight and ignore the issue as we type.
The dogs of DOGE Whining for relevance Shit on everything
Because the headline underplays it quite a bit the actual story here is that the Social Security Administration has referred two DOGE employees for Hatch Act violations after discovering contacts with a political group seeking SSA data to overturn election results.
Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46700527.
> a political group seeking SSA data to overturn election results
Guesses as to what they were looking for?
[dead]