← Back to context

Comment by LegitShady

16 hours ago

when I want display reviews I go to rtings.com

haven't found anyone who compares

Rtings publishes charts in abundance, but the subjective quality of a monitor is more important. For example, a chart will tell you a monitor has low color deviation from sRGB after calibration, but won't tell you that the monitor UI takes 10 laggy clicks to switch from sRGB to DCI-P3 and will reset your selection every time you toggle HDR mode.

I admire Rtings' attempts to add more and more graphs to quantify everything from VRR flicker to raised black levels. They were helpful when I last shopped for a monitor. But the most valuable information came from veteran monitor review sites such as Monitors Unboxed and TFTCentral.

Agreed; rtings has by far the best reviews and comparisons, and detailed tests nobody else seems to do.

I originally found them because they were one of the only sources that tested for PWM flicker in monitors.

  • Rtings good at measures, but bad at conclusions. Take their numbers and make your own opinion. Prad.de is better at that respect.

    • They do a good job of supporting whatever comparisons you want to make, which is useful if you have different preferences; however, I do think they have clear conclusions in many cases, to capture strengths, weaknesses, and "best of" recommendations.

      1 reply →