Comment by charcircuit
13 hours ago
Many open source projects fail to find sustainable funding. If a cure is not financially viable it is not much different than the cure not existing.
13 hours ago
Many open source projects fail to find sustainable funding. If a cure is not financially viable it is not much different than the cure not existing.
So, you're not wrong.
People that work for money will want money, and ultimately can be bought.
People that work for love produce the best they can with limited resources, and are often broke.
I don't think we've found a way to bridge the gap. I've come to generally rely on work people do for love, and I contribute to them, but it's clearly not sustainable unless they have another source of income.
Anyone who solves this will produce immense value.
What's to solve? Here's the way the gap is supposed to work and often does: People work for love or money on a product. Other people love the product and are happy to purchase it. This creates income for the original producer and a beneficial product for the consumer. If a product is successful and popular enough, the capitalist cycle gains momentum for both parties to continue the relationship.
Apt analogy as pharmaceutical industry is also kinda similar.