Comment by Gander5739
1 month ago
You seem to be arguing in bad faith, so this will be my last reply.
It does not persist today; I removed it. It occured once, 10 years ago, and again, a few months ago.
1 month ago
You seem to be arguing in bad faith, so this will be my last reply.
It does not persist today; I removed it. It occured once, 10 years ago, and again, a few months ago.
"Arguing in bad faith" - what would that actually mean? Would it be the same as using a sock puppet to push an agenda? That wasn't me, that's what I'm pointing out and you're dismissing for no good reason.
Regardless:
- The page is still titled "Constitution…" when the opening paragraph contains "The name "Constitution of Medina" is misleading as the text did not establish a state." Make that make sense.
- "and the first "Constitution"" is still in the page
It persists.
Now, what I might consider bad faith is:
- being unwilling to answer simple, straightforward questions, which is apt, considering Socrates was an Athenian
- having such an interest in the page that you claim you made edits
- not checking properly and thus thinking this only happened twice, and wasn't part of attritional arguments, rollbacks, edits and counter-edits
Wikipedia must be alright if one does not wish to see a problem.