Comment by Dylan16807

I agree with everything you said there.

My argument is that this distortion in favor of the seller isn't really good or bad in a meaningful way. It's just rude.

The seller is happy as long as their limit is hit, the buyer is happy as long as their limit isn't hit. How should the surplus happiness get split? I dunno. So the earlier poster sticking their finger in and shifting the surplus around isn't a particularly moral issue.