← Back to context

Comment by CrzyLngPwd

20 hours ago

Labelling people this way is a blunt instrument.

It seems like the introvert/extrovert split, where few people are near the poles and there's a lot more going on in the middle.

E.g. I might check if someone has weekend plans before asking if I can stay with them. Or, I might ask outright, but specify it's not important, I just want to catch up, and the nearby hotel looks nice.

These seem like important differences even though they're both in the middle of ask and guess.

Yes, I don't support labelling people as one or the other, but defining and articulating the two kinds of behaviors and expectations relative to each other is incredibly useful for communication and understanding.

  • If these behavioral models are indeed good and close enough to the reality. But that whole stuff comes from some internet comment!

    I agree it's better to label behaviors or situations than people.

But it is useful if you apply that labeling to yourself. It also helps with empathy.

Indeed. There is likely more of a spectrum. That said, I think applying the label to a given scenario, or a person's tendencies can be useful.

I agree, but the fundamental problem is a blunt one to begin with. It should not be a way to label people, but decisions.

Guess culture is playing defense against the outcrowd. Ask culture is playing offense to achieve higher-level thinking and goals.

This isn't always a deliberate thing. Still, everyone has to pick their plays with every interaction they have.