← Back to context Comment by da_chicken 13 hours ago Confusing baud and bit rates is consistent with actually being there, though. 2 comments da_chicken Reply Jedd 12 hours ago As someone that started with 300/300 and went via 1200/75 to 9600 etc - I don't believe conflating signalling changes with bps is an indication of physical or temporal proximity. drzaiusx11 2 hours ago I think it was a joke implying you'd be old enough to forget because of age, which in my case is definitely true...
Jedd 12 hours ago As someone that started with 300/300 and went via 1200/75 to 9600 etc - I don't believe conflating signalling changes with bps is an indication of physical or temporal proximity. drzaiusx11 2 hours ago I think it was a joke implying you'd be old enough to forget because of age, which in my case is definitely true...
drzaiusx11 2 hours ago I think it was a joke implying you'd be old enough to forget because of age, which in my case is definitely true...
As someone that started with 300/300 and went via 1200/75 to 9600 etc - I don't believe conflating signalling changes with bps is an indication of physical or temporal proximity.
I think it was a joke implying you'd be old enough to forget because of age, which in my case is definitely true...