← Back to context Comment by BearOso 18 hours ago Rust becomes a significant burden if you need a GUI or hardware-accelerated graphics. 3 comments BearOso Reply jenadine 13 hours ago C++ isn't much better for GUI. pjmlp 12 hours ago C++ was the GUI king during the 1990's, and none of the Rust toolkits is half as good as the surviving frameworks, like C++ Builder, Qt, wxWidgets, heck even MFC has better tooling. johnny22 13 hours ago I assume most of them are just grabbing qt
jenadine 13 hours ago C++ isn't much better for GUI. pjmlp 12 hours ago C++ was the GUI king during the 1990's, and none of the Rust toolkits is half as good as the surviving frameworks, like C++ Builder, Qt, wxWidgets, heck even MFC has better tooling. johnny22 13 hours ago I assume most of them are just grabbing qt
pjmlp 12 hours ago C++ was the GUI king during the 1990's, and none of the Rust toolkits is half as good as the surviving frameworks, like C++ Builder, Qt, wxWidgets, heck even MFC has better tooling.
C++ isn't much better for GUI.
C++ was the GUI king during the 1990's, and none of the Rust toolkits is half as good as the surviving frameworks, like C++ Builder, Qt, wxWidgets, heck even MFC has better tooling.
I assume most of them are just grabbing qt