← Back to context Comment by Kinrany 5 hours ago There's also the alternative of having a cluster with one local DB in each node 3 comments Kinrany Reply direwolf20 3 hours ago Then you have massive synchronization problems if your data isn't almost read–only. Gabrys1 3 hours ago if your data isn't mostly read-only, then you're going to have an issue with SQLite. It doesn't nicely support parallel writers CuriouslyC 2 hours ago Not if you're sharding correctly.
direwolf20 3 hours ago Then you have massive synchronization problems if your data isn't almost read–only. Gabrys1 3 hours ago if your data isn't mostly read-only, then you're going to have an issue with SQLite. It doesn't nicely support parallel writers CuriouslyC 2 hours ago Not if you're sharding correctly.
Gabrys1 3 hours ago if your data isn't mostly read-only, then you're going to have an issue with SQLite. It doesn't nicely support parallel writers
Then you have massive synchronization problems if your data isn't almost read–only.
if your data isn't mostly read-only, then you're going to have an issue with SQLite. It doesn't nicely support parallel writers
Not if you're sharding correctly.