← Back to context Comment by Kinrany 12 hours ago There's also the alternative of having a cluster with one local DB in each node 3 comments Kinrany Reply direwolf20 11 hours ago Then you have massive synchronization problems if your data isn't almost read–only. Gabrys1 10 hours ago if your data isn't mostly read-only, then you're going to have an issue with SQLite. It doesn't nicely support parallel writers CuriouslyC 10 hours ago Not if you're sharding correctly.
direwolf20 11 hours ago Then you have massive synchronization problems if your data isn't almost read–only. Gabrys1 10 hours ago if your data isn't mostly read-only, then you're going to have an issue with SQLite. It doesn't nicely support parallel writers CuriouslyC 10 hours ago Not if you're sharding correctly.
Gabrys1 10 hours ago if your data isn't mostly read-only, then you're going to have an issue with SQLite. It doesn't nicely support parallel writers
Then you have massive synchronization problems if your data isn't almost read–only.
if your data isn't mostly read-only, then you're going to have an issue with SQLite. It doesn't nicely support parallel writers
Not if you're sharding correctly.