← Back to context Comment by throwaway150 4 hours ago It does not? HTML 4.01 is not XML. So not XHTML. What's the confusion? 3 comments throwaway150 Reply reconnecting 4 hours ago Both technologies are from the same period and share same validation culture from W3. jraph 4 hours ago > Both technologies are from the same periodNot really, XHTML is as current as HTML 5.XHTML 1.0 is older and is indeed (more or less?) the XML variant of HTML 4.01. reconnecting 4 hours ago How so? HTML 4.01 is from 1999, XHTML 1.0 from 2000.XHTML club mentioned valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional), not general XHTML.
reconnecting 4 hours ago Both technologies are from the same period and share same validation culture from W3. jraph 4 hours ago > Both technologies are from the same periodNot really, XHTML is as current as HTML 5.XHTML 1.0 is older and is indeed (more or less?) the XML variant of HTML 4.01. reconnecting 4 hours ago How so? HTML 4.01 is from 1999, XHTML 1.0 from 2000.XHTML club mentioned valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional), not general XHTML.
jraph 4 hours ago > Both technologies are from the same periodNot really, XHTML is as current as HTML 5.XHTML 1.0 is older and is indeed (more or less?) the XML variant of HTML 4.01. reconnecting 4 hours ago How so? HTML 4.01 is from 1999, XHTML 1.0 from 2000.XHTML club mentioned valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional), not general XHTML.
reconnecting 4 hours ago How so? HTML 4.01 is from 1999, XHTML 1.0 from 2000.XHTML club mentioned valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional), not general XHTML.
Both technologies are from the same period and share same validation culture from W3.
> Both technologies are from the same period
Not really, XHTML is as current as HTML 5.
XHTML 1.0 is older and is indeed (more or less?) the XML variant of HTML 4.01.
How so? HTML 4.01 is from 1999, XHTML 1.0 from 2000.
XHTML club mentioned valid XHTML 1.0 Strict (or Transitional), not general XHTML.