Comment by falcor84
7 hours ago
I generally am a fan of polished writing, but I do believe that there's room for quickly fired experimental stuff, and quite enjoyed this piece. With the speed he was going, I wouldn't be surprised if the system architecture actually changed in between subsequent sections of the post. It's not a scientific article, but just a cross-country runner at the top of his game giving us a quick update without breaking his stride, and I'm all here for that.
As Basil Exposition said "I suggest you don’t worry about this sort of thing and just enjoy yourself".
Sure. The critique is with his incoherently labeled images, not his prose or passion project.
If LLMs can't produce readable technical diagrams ("Figure n"), avoid them for diagramming.
Don't insult the reader with strings like Oarity, Ed3e Csess, Ouclstnoc, relinemen, ressore Critieal, Foll Throughput, Witnese/Refin, ecstate ta Mayor, and Hsoide Fulures Stafey Fen.
https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/format:webp/1*X3z...
https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/format:webp/1*7Cr...
https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/format:webp/1*blw...
I like how ‘refine 1’ is correctness, followed by ‘refine 2’, which is of course ‘oarity’.
I’m convinced that AI has totally broken the brains of its users; how on earth could you look at this thing and think “yes, that is a reasonable thing to post in public”? For whatever reason, for many users, the lesson of the AI revolution seems to be “just produce arbitrarily shoddy nonsense, it’s fine, nobody cares anyway”… The worrying thing is that this may be _true_.