← Back to context

Comment by quotemstr

1 month ago

That's a distinction without a difference. Microsoft should structure Windows such that they're unable to comply with such an order, however legal. There are practical cryptographic ways to do it: Microsoft just doesn't want to. Shame on them.

It is pretty uncontroverisal that the owner, in the sense of having responsibility and ultimate control, should control the cryptographic keys. I think the disagreement here is who owns the computer.