← Back to context Comment by withinboredom 1 month ago Please don’t use git-flow. Every time I see it, it looks like an over-engineer’s wet dream. 3 comments withinboredom Reply seff 1 month ago Can you say more as to why? The concept is not complex and in our situation at least provides a lot of benefits. jdxcode 1 month ago I think the guy that created it has even stated he thinks it's a bad idea withinboredom 1 month ago Literally the reason’s for git’s existence is to make merging diverging histories less complicated. Adding back the complexity misses the point entirely.
seff 1 month ago Can you say more as to why? The concept is not complex and in our situation at least provides a lot of benefits. jdxcode 1 month ago I think the guy that created it has even stated he thinks it's a bad idea withinboredom 1 month ago Literally the reason’s for git’s existence is to make merging diverging histories less complicated. Adding back the complexity misses the point entirely.
withinboredom 1 month ago Literally the reason’s for git’s existence is to make merging diverging histories less complicated. Adding back the complexity misses the point entirely.
Can you say more as to why? The concept is not complex and in our situation at least provides a lot of benefits.
I think the guy that created it has even stated he thinks it's a bad idea
Literally the reason’s for git’s existence is to make merging diverging histories less complicated. Adding back the complexity misses the point entirely.