← Back to context Comment by withinboredom 19 hours ago Please don’t use git-flow. Every time I see it, it looks like an over-engineer’s wet dream. 3 comments withinboredom Reply seff 19 hours ago Can you say more as to why? The concept is not complex and in our situation at least provides a lot of benefits. jdxcode 18 hours ago I think the guy that created it has even stated he thinks it's a bad idea withinboredom 18 hours ago Literally the reason’s for git’s existence is to make merging diverging histories less complicated. Adding back the complexity misses the point entirely.
seff 19 hours ago Can you say more as to why? The concept is not complex and in our situation at least provides a lot of benefits. jdxcode 18 hours ago I think the guy that created it has even stated he thinks it's a bad idea withinboredom 18 hours ago Literally the reason’s for git’s existence is to make merging diverging histories less complicated. Adding back the complexity misses the point entirely.
withinboredom 18 hours ago Literally the reason’s for git’s existence is to make merging diverging histories less complicated. Adding back the complexity misses the point entirely.
Can you say more as to why? The concept is not complex and in our situation at least provides a lot of benefits.
I think the guy that created it has even stated he thinks it's a bad idea
Literally the reason’s for git’s existence is to make merging diverging histories less complicated. Adding back the complexity misses the point entirely.