← Back to context Comment by joemazerino 3 days ago [flagged] 2 comments joemazerino Reply grumio 3 days ago If someone has a firearm and resists arrest... you arrest him.Is there proof of lethal self-defence being required? Then show the proof of that, nothing has come out in support of that.Your hypothetical is big, if true... but it's not.
grumio 3 days ago If someone has a firearm and resists arrest... you arrest him.Is there proof of lethal self-defence being required? Then show the proof of that, nothing has come out in support of that.Your hypothetical is big, if true... but it's not.
If someone has a firearm and resists arrest... you arrest him.
Is there proof of lethal self-defence being required? Then show the proof of that, nothing has come out in support of that.
Your hypothetical is big, if true... but it's not.