Comment by chii

a project is a dictatorship, not a democracy.

The dictator could be benevolent - as is most, because it's the most beneficial to be one. However, there's no rules that says they must be. They could run it with an iron fist. The contributors do so knowing this - or at least, should have known this.

Look at wordpress's fiasco, for example.

You are under the illusion that the owner is doing the project for the betterment of the community. They _might_ be, but it's not a requirement.

I personally behave as if everyone is selfish, and will be out to screw you if given the opportunity and reason. Assume the worst and plan for that; if it turns out they are nice, then all the better.