← Back to context Comment by loeg 4 hours ago It's 32 bits of milliseconds, right? Hm, no, that would overflow much sooner (49.7 days). 2 comments loeg Reply oasisaimlessly 4 hours ago It's a uint32_t of 750 Hz "jiffies", which does overflow at ~66 days. userbinator 2 hours ago While that seems like a convincing explanation, 750Hz is a rather odd value to use for a timer, and more importantly the overflow would be at 66d6h43m43s instead of the reported ~66d12h.
oasisaimlessly 4 hours ago It's a uint32_t of 750 Hz "jiffies", which does overflow at ~66 days. userbinator 2 hours ago While that seems like a convincing explanation, 750Hz is a rather odd value to use for a timer, and more importantly the overflow would be at 66d6h43m43s instead of the reported ~66d12h.
userbinator 2 hours ago While that seems like a convincing explanation, 750Hz is a rather odd value to use for a timer, and more importantly the overflow would be at 66d6h43m43s instead of the reported ~66d12h.
It's a uint32_t of 750 Hz "jiffies", which does overflow at ~66 days.
While that seems like a convincing explanation, 750Hz is a rather odd value to use for a timer, and more importantly the overflow would be at 66d6h43m43s instead of the reported ~66d12h.