Comment by Nezteb
11 hours ago
> So Wikipedia is corrupt as per usual. Grokipedia's article is significantly less biased and more accurate.
I hope this was sarcasm.
11 hours ago
> So Wikipedia is corrupt as per usual. Grokipedia's article is significantly less biased and more accurate.
I hope this was sarcasm.
I would hope the same. But knowing Wikipedia I'm afraid it isn't.