Please pull your head out of your rear. I disagree with the article's claims as poorly founded happy talk, but you are not contributing anything of substance.
I don't see how your claim of lack-of-contribution is correct.
I'm stating, to quote you "I disagree with the article's claims as poorly founded happy talk".
Additionally I'm stating that it really vastly depends on which 3.5% of the population you're talking about, as to weather they have the ability to make major changes to world wide economic policy.
To me, this seems to contribute much more substance than "pull your head out of your rear"...
Please pull your head out of your rear. I disagree with the article's claims as poorly founded happy talk, but you are not contributing anything of substance.
I don't see how your claim of lack-of-contribution is correct.
I'm stating, to quote you "I disagree with the article's claims as poorly founded happy talk".
Additionally I'm stating that it really vastly depends on which 3.5% of the population you're talking about, as to weather they have the ability to make major changes to world wide economic policy.
To me, this seems to contribute much more substance than "pull your head out of your rear"...