Comment by cthalupa

Or we could look at the video where we can actually see the distance between the officer and the vehicle.

That's really all that matters. We have a video that shows the distance between the two for all of the relevant points of the situation. What you might have guessed something would have been from a bad angle becomes an irrelevant metric when there is superior evidence available. I don't know why it looks like he is moving that way on a ultra compressed low resolution video shot from a distance. I don't really care, either, because I can look at the video that was shot from right at the scene, with higher resolution, less compression, and a much better angle.

You've also completely dodged the overwhelming majority of the comment where the meat of the argument was for anything that actually matters. Hell, not even the most relevant point for just Good. Even if I were to agree she had hit him with the car, the medical examiner determined the fatal shot was either the 2nd or 3rd which came through the driver window of the car.

But how were either of these riots? How do they reinforce your argument that there is rioting?

Why are you being disingenuous in how you present the argument being made to you?

Why are you arguing to hold people who are at least nominally law enforcement to a lower standard than everyday civilians when it comes to following it?