← Back to context

Comment by kuerbel

2 hours ago

Who are "these guys"? Are they the same people mentioned in the article? Why would you assume that everyone caring about the environment is the same?

If you are referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snail_darter_controversy

It says:

This accusation ignores the fact that the formal species description (Etnier, 1976) was thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication and has withstood decades of scrutiny—-even from biologists employed by TVA. Etnier himself acknowledged that genetic affinities between snail darters and stargazing darters would be instrumental in fully understanding their degree of relatedness and divergence (Etnier, 1976:487).

Regardless of whether snail darters are genetically distinct from stargazing darters based on current scientific data, the Little Tennessee River population in the 1970s would have nevertheless represented a population separated from the core population of stargazing darters by over 700 river miles of habitat highly modified by nearly 100 years of impoundment projects. As such, the Little Tennessee River population may still very well have qualified for protection under ESA as a sub-species or as a distinct population segment, as the ESA is applied today.

It was transparently an attempt to block the dam. Thank god Congress of that time wasn’t that convinced by the guy running dam protests suddenly finding an endangered species. The Wikipedia editor is not fully informed. These days this is the canonical example of scientific malpractice in this pseudo environmental approach.