← Back to context

Comment by troyvit

24 days ago

Just a piece of advice. If a woman calls it rape it's not on her to prove it. It's on the man to prove it's not. This goes doubly when you're talking about one of the most powerful men in the world. There are dynamics at play here that none of us would be able to comprehend.

Here's another source:

https://www.kron4.com/news/technology-ai/former-google-ceo-s...

An interesting thing is how most of the photos that the media is using to cover this are sexualized images of Ritter and pics of Schmidt in a suit.

I asked for no such proof. Quit making things up.

EDIT: It's really interesting that your link mentions nothing about any rape charges. These inconsistencies are why I am confused and asking questions. These inconsistencies should have you asking questions, too.

  • Good point. Read into the case where you'll find out more instead of relying on other people to do your searching for you. When you say stuff like:

    > So she didn't have any problems "escaping" the relationship.

    It's pretty telling that you don't have a sense of the power dynamics that come with sexual violence like this, especially, as I said, with somebody like Eric Schmidt.

    • You presume there was sexual violence even though there is no mention of it in your link. Or are you ignoring that?

      Tell me what difficulty she had escaping the relationship. You act like you know more than I.

      1 reply →