← Back to context Comment by 1f60c 7 hours ago This is pretty interesting but why not just pay the 20 bucks? 5 comments 1f60c Reply blibble 7 hours ago I would not use an SSH client written by someone that feels it's OK to break the terms of the contract this waywho knows what's coming next? user3939382 5 hours ago The SSH deal has been altered. Pray I don’t alter it any further. csshck hoh. __float 7 hours ago The second paragraph explains this: they already have paid, and some people have paid [again], but their purchase is not accepted. dcdc123 7 hours ago The issue is people that already paid lost their pro features unless they pay _again_.
blibble 7 hours ago I would not use an SSH client written by someone that feels it's OK to break the terms of the contract this waywho knows what's coming next? user3939382 5 hours ago The SSH deal has been altered. Pray I don’t alter it any further. csshck hoh.
user3939382 5 hours ago The SSH deal has been altered. Pray I don’t alter it any further. csshck hoh.
__float 7 hours ago The second paragraph explains this: they already have paid, and some people have paid [again], but their purchase is not accepted.
dcdc123 7 hours ago The issue is people that already paid lost their pro features unless they pay _again_.
I would not use an SSH client written by someone that feels it's OK to break the terms of the contract this way
who knows what's coming next?
The SSH deal has been altered. Pray I don’t alter it any further. csshck hoh.
The second paragraph explains this: they already have paid, and some people have paid [again], but their purchase is not accepted.
The issue is people that already paid lost their pro features unless they pay _again_.