Comment by tavavex
1 day ago
I think this argument would work better if the AirTag in its minimal form wasn't so teardrop-shaped. It feels almost like it was designed to be difficult to integrate into other environments because it lacks any edges or openings. It ensures that anything that could hold it must be at least as big as the AirTag itself. It really confuses me why they couldn't even allow for a single small hole in its edge - it would still leave attachment up to the user, but make it far more flexible by letting people just hook it onto things. Is it because design had overpowered functionality in this product? Is it because this shape is somehow mandated by the hardware within it? It confuses me.
> If the AirTag in its minimal form wasn't so teardrop-shaped
I'm a little confused by this, aren't AirTag basically circular discs pretty much just big enough to house a CRT2032 battery?
Form factor wise they don't look teardrop shaped at all in the pictures?
I don't have one so could just be missing something obvious here.
I think it’s designed around that easily replaceable and very commonly found battery.
Which is an appreciated and surprisingly un-Apple move. Despite some physical limitations this imposes, I applaud it.
An Apple product in which design takes precedence over usability. Imagine that.
That shape is symbolic of the tears of those who wish nothing more than to track where they've left their keys.