← Back to context

Comment by Veserv

7 hours ago

It did not compile [1], so your belief was correct.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46649046

It did compile - the coding agents were compiling it constantly.

It didn't have correctly configured GitHub Actions so the CI build was broken.

  • Then you should have no difficulty providing evidence for your claim. Since you have been engaging in language lawyering in this thread, it is only fair your evidence be held up to the same standard and must be incontrovertible evidence for your claims with zero wiggle room.

    Even though I have no burden of proof to debunk your claims as you have provided no evidence for your claims, I will point out that another commenter [1] indicates there were build errors. And the developer agrees there were build errors [2] that they resolved.

    [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46650998

    • I mean I interviewed the engineer for 47 minutes and asked him about this and many other things directly. I think I've done enough homework on this one.

      I take back the implication I inadvertently made here that it compiled cleanly the whole time - I know that's not the case, we discussed that in our interview: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/23/fastrender/#intermitte...

      I'm frustrated at how many people are carrying around a mental model that the project "didn't even compile" implying the code had never successfully compiled, which clearly isn't true.

      3 replies →