← Back to context Comment by HNisCIS 1 month ago Dual energy x ray has been around forever though, like decades. 4 comments HNisCIS Reply bleepblap 1 month ago Certainly, but a) not at the prices people wanted to spend to get 25,000 of them b) not at the maintenance cost for 25,000 of them c) without the software to (by someone's metric) discriminate between shampoo and bomb with enough error codethief 1 month ago 25,000? Interesting. Is there anywhere I can read up on this? bleepblap 1 month ago There are a lot of airports in the Us and 2.5 million passengers transit them daily. 1 reply →
bleepblap 1 month ago Certainly, but a) not at the prices people wanted to spend to get 25,000 of them b) not at the maintenance cost for 25,000 of them c) without the software to (by someone's metric) discriminate between shampoo and bomb with enough error codethief 1 month ago 25,000? Interesting. Is there anywhere I can read up on this? bleepblap 1 month ago There are a lot of airports in the Us and 2.5 million passengers transit them daily. 1 reply →
codethief 1 month ago 25,000? Interesting. Is there anywhere I can read up on this? bleepblap 1 month ago There are a lot of airports in the Us and 2.5 million passengers transit them daily. 1 reply →
bleepblap 1 month ago There are a lot of airports in the Us and 2.5 million passengers transit them daily. 1 reply →
Certainly, but a) not at the prices people wanted to spend to get 25,000 of them b) not at the maintenance cost for 25,000 of them c) without the software to (by someone's metric) discriminate between shampoo and bomb with enough error
25,000? Interesting. Is there anywhere I can read up on this?
There are a lot of airports in the Us and 2.5 million passengers transit them daily.
1 reply →