← Back to context Comment by joe_mamba 17 hours ago [flagged] 14 comments joe_mamba Reply saagarjha 17 hours ago Maybe we shouldn’t have a system where these happen. joe_mamba 17 hours ago [flagged] saubeidl 17 hours ago You think the appropriate punishment for interfering with a simple administrative act is gunshots to the back of the head? Are you even reading what you're saying??? 7 replies → saubeidl 17 hours ago Shooting somebody that is already constrained is an execution, not an accident.It's what fascist regimes do to anyone they deem noncompliant. joe_mamba 17 hours ago [flagged] saubeidl 17 hours ago Nobody assaulted anyone. Shooting somebody that is already on the ground in the back of their head is not self defence. ICE is not law enforcement.Impressively, you managed to misrepresent a fact with every single word in your sentence. 1 reply →
saagarjha 17 hours ago Maybe we shouldn’t have a system where these happen. joe_mamba 17 hours ago [flagged] saubeidl 17 hours ago You think the appropriate punishment for interfering with a simple administrative act is gunshots to the back of the head? Are you even reading what you're saying??? 7 replies →
joe_mamba 17 hours ago [flagged] saubeidl 17 hours ago You think the appropriate punishment for interfering with a simple administrative act is gunshots to the back of the head? Are you even reading what you're saying??? 7 replies →
saubeidl 17 hours ago You think the appropriate punishment for interfering with a simple administrative act is gunshots to the back of the head? Are you even reading what you're saying??? 7 replies →
saubeidl 17 hours ago Shooting somebody that is already constrained is an execution, not an accident.It's what fascist regimes do to anyone they deem noncompliant. joe_mamba 17 hours ago [flagged] saubeidl 17 hours ago Nobody assaulted anyone. Shooting somebody that is already on the ground in the back of their head is not self defence. ICE is not law enforcement.Impressively, you managed to misrepresent a fact with every single word in your sentence. 1 reply →
joe_mamba 17 hours ago [flagged] saubeidl 17 hours ago Nobody assaulted anyone. Shooting somebody that is already on the ground in the back of their head is not self defence. ICE is not law enforcement.Impressively, you managed to misrepresent a fact with every single word in your sentence. 1 reply →
saubeidl 17 hours ago Nobody assaulted anyone. Shooting somebody that is already on the ground in the back of their head is not self defence. ICE is not law enforcement.Impressively, you managed to misrepresent a fact with every single word in your sentence. 1 reply →
Maybe we shouldn’t have a system where these happen.
[flagged]
You think the appropriate punishment for interfering with a simple administrative act is gunshots to the back of the head? Are you even reading what you're saying???
7 replies →
Shooting somebody that is already constrained is an execution, not an accident.
It's what fascist regimes do to anyone they deem noncompliant.
[flagged]
Nobody assaulted anyone. Shooting somebody that is already on the ground in the back of their head is not self defence. ICE is not law enforcement.
Impressively, you managed to misrepresent a fact with every single word in your sentence.
1 reply →