← Back to context

Comment by saubeidl

20 hours ago

You think the appropriate punishment for interfering with a simple administrative act is gunshots to the back of the head? Are you even reading what you're saying???

7 comments

saubeidl

Reply
joe_mamba  19 hours ago

Police have the right to defend themselves if they fear for their lives. It was terrible accident indeed that could have been voided if he'd not physically interfere or have a gun on him.

  • saubeidl  19 hours ago

    Defend themselves from the already pinned down person that never drew a gun by shooting him to the back of the head?

    Think about what you're saying. You're trying to defend the indefensible.