It is mind boggling how you keep trying to deflect away given your narrative.
> Trump got a standing ovation at Davos and got a deal for Greenland
And you don't know what is the deal, at all, so how can you base your entire argument in something you simply do not know? You don't know, you simply do not know.
Then tell us what powers does the Dutch NATO chief has to make a deal in name of Greenland and Denmark.
Trump got empty hands, he got totally played by the nice words of Rutte.
Edit: Your conversation is really mind boggling:
"Trump got a great deal on Greenland!"
"What deal?"
"How would I know?!?!?!"
It is not mind boggling if you don't manipulate quotes to fit for your narrative.
Nice way of avoiding the main question: What deal? There is no new deal between Greenland/Denmark and US.
It is mind boggling how you keep trying to deflect away given your narrative.
> Trump got a standing ovation at Davos and got a deal for Greenland
And you don't know what is the deal, at all, so how can you base your entire argument in something you simply do not know? You don't know, you simply do not know.
2 replies →