← Back to context Comment by patjensen 1 month ago Just wait for systemd-wayland. 4 comments patjensen Reply LeFantome 1 month ago Systemd does not have to force Wayland as it is already going the other way. Both GNOME and KDE are requiring systemd now. dlcarrier 1 month ago KDE support doesn't even require Linux, let alone Systemd: https://community.kde.org/FreeBSD/SetupGNOME, on the other hand, practically wants everything running on the exact same software stack, so it requiring a package means nothing. cf100clunk 1 month ago This discussion is originally about xfce, which does not require systemd now. michaelmrose 1 month ago Gnome?
LeFantome 1 month ago Systemd does not have to force Wayland as it is already going the other way. Both GNOME and KDE are requiring systemd now. dlcarrier 1 month ago KDE support doesn't even require Linux, let alone Systemd: https://community.kde.org/FreeBSD/SetupGNOME, on the other hand, practically wants everything running on the exact same software stack, so it requiring a package means nothing. cf100clunk 1 month ago This discussion is originally about xfce, which does not require systemd now.
dlcarrier 1 month ago KDE support doesn't even require Linux, let alone Systemd: https://community.kde.org/FreeBSD/SetupGNOME, on the other hand, practically wants everything running on the exact same software stack, so it requiring a package means nothing.
Systemd does not have to force Wayland as it is already going the other way. Both GNOME and KDE are requiring systemd now.
KDE support doesn't even require Linux, let alone Systemd: https://community.kde.org/FreeBSD/Setup
GNOME, on the other hand, practically wants everything running on the exact same software stack, so it requiring a package means nothing.
This discussion is originally about xfce, which does not require systemd now.
Gnome?