Comment by wswope
6 hours ago
I’m plenty calm. There’s just nothing to debate here: the blog post and repo are a conscious, deliberate, and egregious misrepresentation of fact.
I would absolutely say exactly the same things to the author’s face as I’m saying right now. I would never work for a company that condones this in a million years, as a matter of principle.
And I didn't say that you cannot criticise it (or did you think I was talking to you personally?).
I just see a lot of comments from people who just seem happy to see that they can contribute to ruining someone else's day (or more).
> or did you think I was talking to you personally?
You wrote,
> May I kindly ask you to calm the fuck down?
So yes, a reasonable person would conclude that you were talking to them.
> I just see a lot of comments from people who just seem happy to see that they can contribute to ruining someone else's day (or more).
Which comments do you see doing that? Exactly?
> You wrote,
And you don't seem to understand how the conversation went. I was obviously talking about my first comment, to which they answered.
> Which comments do you see doing that? Exactly?
Interestingly, those that made me write my first message were removed. Not that it was because of my message obviously, which mostly got me downvotes :-).
But the next best one would be:
"public shaming is the next best thing. I sincerely hope links to this incident will haunt him every time someone googles his name forevermore"
(after implying that ideally they should lose their job for this)