← Back to context

Comment by ModernMech

1 day ago

You have to remember that "the government" is not a monolith. Evidence goes before a judge who is (supposed to be) independent, and cases are tried in front of a jury of citizens. In the future that system may fall but for now it's working properly. Except for the Supreme Court... which is a giant wrench in the idea the system still works, but that doesn't mean a lower court judge won't jettison evidence obtained by gunpoint.

Evidence goes before a judge

What evidence went before a judge prior to the two latest executions in Minneapolis?

  • There's a pretty big difference between getting killed in an altercation with ICE, and executing someone just because they refuse to give up their password.

    • Not really. ICE breaks into your home — remember they don't need a warrant for this. Demands to see your phone. It's locked. Holds a gun to your head and demands you unlock it. You refuse. Pulls the trigger.

      Does it really seem that far–fetched when compared to the other ICE murders?

      9 replies →

The courts may (still) be independent, but it feels like they are pointless because the government just wholesale ignores them anyway. If the executive branch doesn't enforce, or selectively enforces court judgements, you may as well shutter the courts.