← Back to context Comment by cess11 21 hours ago By before, what do you mean? COINTELPRO? 3 comments cess11 Reply Analemma_ 21 hours ago This is exactly my point. Yes, COINTELPRO was really bad. But it was intelligence and disruption, they weren't executing people on the street and then bragging about how they'd get away with it. Do you not see the difference? cess11 4 minutes ago COINTELPRO included assassinations. They kind of didn't stop there either.https://web.archive.org/web/20170201130225/http://www.nytime... defen 19 hours ago They drugged and executed Fred Hampton and no one suffered any consequences for that as far as I know.
Analemma_ 21 hours ago This is exactly my point. Yes, COINTELPRO was really bad. But it was intelligence and disruption, they weren't executing people on the street and then bragging about how they'd get away with it. Do you not see the difference? cess11 4 minutes ago COINTELPRO included assassinations. They kind of didn't stop there either.https://web.archive.org/web/20170201130225/http://www.nytime... defen 19 hours ago They drugged and executed Fred Hampton and no one suffered any consequences for that as far as I know.
cess11 4 minutes ago COINTELPRO included assassinations. They kind of didn't stop there either.https://web.archive.org/web/20170201130225/http://www.nytime...
defen 19 hours ago They drugged and executed Fred Hampton and no one suffered any consequences for that as far as I know.
This is exactly my point. Yes, COINTELPRO was really bad. But it was intelligence and disruption, they weren't executing people on the street and then bragging about how they'd get away with it. Do you not see the difference?
COINTELPRO included assassinations. They kind of didn't stop there either.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170201130225/http://www.nytime...
They drugged and executed Fred Hampton and no one suffered any consequences for that as far as I know.