← Back to context

Comment by account42

12 hours ago

> I'm quite aware of the intentionally annoying whistles. You're taking a pretty broad interpretation of "interference." I didn't realize that feds had a protected right to a calm and quiet work environment.

This kind of behavior would not be tolerated any more if it targeted other work environments. Harassment (and that's the most generous interpretation) is not free speech.

Incredible people are taking the position it's ok for law enforcement to execute you in the streets because you're blowing a whistle.

  • That is clearly not the position being taken.

    > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

    > Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.

    • People are arguing the actions of ICE officers is warranted because they're being obstructed and harassed, blowing whistles is obstruction and harassment, their actions include shooting murdering people in the streets.

      QED.

      I don't know how else to read it. Inform me.

      If anything the actions ICE is taking is even worse, Pretti didn't even have a terrorist assault whistle.

      1 reply →

> This kind of behavior would not be tolerated any more if it targeted other work environments

Yeah? It's exactly the fact that their work environment is public streets and other people's homes, schools, and churches that prompt this behavior.