← Back to context

Comment by account42

10 hours ago

Wile I don't think they deserved to loose their lives over it, calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest. They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process.

> They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process

Pretti was breaking zero laws. You’d have to do some prosecutorial voodoo to conjure up a misdemeanor.

There is lawbreaking in that videos. But the felony-level stuff is all from folks in uniform. (Which, thankfully, they’ve started wearing.)

  • > Pretti was breaking zero laws. You’d have to do some prosecutorial voodoo to conjure up a misdemeanor.

    Does an ongoing protest empower civilians to stand in the middle of a road that has not been closed to traffic by local authorities?

Being a nuisance is not illegal. In the eyes of the law, someone being a nuisance is, indeed, innocent - and to say so is not dishonest.

So now being a nuisance is justification for summary extrajudicial executions?! If people on HN believe this then we’re toast.