← Back to context

Comment by anonymous908213

8 hours ago

Aren't they still going to need to reach out to the big players because of the regulatory environment? And for good reason, as it happens. We don't need hospitals handing over the public's health data to the cheapest person they can find to prompt it all into Claude.

You can be a small player and still deliver immense value in health care I work at a firm in a niche with about 30 employees. We follow all regulations and go above and beyond them in regards to security.

  • Just anecdotally, my experience was the total opposite. I didn't work in the health care industry long though and I think you're probably right in general. But you might also find there's a lot of variation between small companies too and a lot of failures for every success I suppose.

  • Absolutely. I'm in the same boat (a bit bigger with around 200).

    It's crazy the underlying business has succeeded despite being boxed in by the software they're currently using. And at least in my niche, you only have a few options. Each with their own unique quirks.

    Instead, EMR's could position themselves as more of a "data provider" where you build bespoke software on top of the underlying storage. And to that end, having the abiliy to pump out small, focused apps can be really beneficial.

> Aren't they still going to need to reach out to the big players because of the regulatory environment?

First, saying "We can now build software faster" doesn't imply that "we" won't eventually include professionals. There is nothing stopping someone from building up an app and having people come in to polish it up.

Second, "regulatory environment" doesn't actually mean somethin because every part of the industry has different regulations and requirements. There are different standards for what big hospitals can use and the software requirements than there are for home care software. So trying to wave this "you can't because of regulations" wand doesn't make sense if you're actually in the business.

Third, I was speaking more to the small-medium sized agency.

Fourth,

> We don't need hospitals handing over the public's health data to the cheapest person they can find to prompt it all into Claude.

Means absolutely nothing since you don't need to feed health data into a Claude instance to build healthcare apps. It sounds like you aren't in the field or familiar with it.

And lastly, if you're a Microsoft customer with a BAA, then you're already covered by HIPAA. Again, not something you would know if you weren't in the industry, but now you do.