← Back to context Comment by simianwords 4 hours ago this is incorrect. it has the concept of truth and facts. 6 comments simianwords Reply usefulcat 4 hours ago How is knowing what word is most likely to come next in a series of words remotely the same as having "the concept of truth and facts"? simianwords 3 hours ago how would you prove that a human has it? usefulcat 3 hours ago Whataboutism is almost never a compelling argument, and this case is no exception.ETA:To elaborate a bit: based on your response, it seems like you don't think my question is a valid one.If you don't think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know why not.If you do think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know your answer. 3 replies →
usefulcat 4 hours ago How is knowing what word is most likely to come next in a series of words remotely the same as having "the concept of truth and facts"? simianwords 3 hours ago how would you prove that a human has it? usefulcat 3 hours ago Whataboutism is almost never a compelling argument, and this case is no exception.ETA:To elaborate a bit: based on your response, it seems like you don't think my question is a valid one.If you don't think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know why not.If you do think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know your answer. 3 replies →
simianwords 3 hours ago how would you prove that a human has it? usefulcat 3 hours ago Whataboutism is almost never a compelling argument, and this case is no exception.ETA:To elaborate a bit: based on your response, it seems like you don't think my question is a valid one.If you don't think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know why not.If you do think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know your answer. 3 replies →
usefulcat 3 hours ago Whataboutism is almost never a compelling argument, and this case is no exception.ETA:To elaborate a bit: based on your response, it seems like you don't think my question is a valid one.If you don't think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know why not.If you do think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know your answer. 3 replies →
How is knowing what word is most likely to come next in a series of words remotely the same as having "the concept of truth and facts"?
how would you prove that a human has it?
Whataboutism is almost never a compelling argument, and this case is no exception.
ETA:
To elaborate a bit: based on your response, it seems like you don't think my question is a valid one.
If you don't think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know why not.
If you do think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know your answer.
3 replies →