← Back to context Comment by jacquesm 2 hours ago The CEO could easily stop this. 4 comments jacquesm Reply siavosh 2 hours ago And the board would replace them. It’s their fiduciary duty. dopamean 2 hours ago The board could argue that it's damaging to the company's brand and long term bottom dollar to charge such usurious fees and fire the CEO for taking such a harsh stance with app developers. siavosh 1 hour ago They could do a lot of things. robotnikman 1 hour ago This. The board and the shareholders are the ones with the real power.
siavosh 2 hours ago And the board would replace them. It’s their fiduciary duty. dopamean 2 hours ago The board could argue that it's damaging to the company's brand and long term bottom dollar to charge such usurious fees and fire the CEO for taking such a harsh stance with app developers. siavosh 1 hour ago They could do a lot of things. robotnikman 1 hour ago This. The board and the shareholders are the ones with the real power.
dopamean 2 hours ago The board could argue that it's damaging to the company's brand and long term bottom dollar to charge such usurious fees and fire the CEO for taking such a harsh stance with app developers. siavosh 1 hour ago They could do a lot of things.
And the board would replace them. It’s their fiduciary duty.
The board could argue that it's damaging to the company's brand and long term bottom dollar to charge such usurious fees and fire the CEO for taking such a harsh stance with app developers.
They could do a lot of things.
This. The board and the shareholders are the ones with the real power.