Comment by donkeybeer
23 days ago
A banks not public property and the people being shot weren't engaging in any crime. A bank can decide what they allow in or not. Its extremely astounding you seem unaware of this. Your "analogy" is completely confused and meaningless.
The parent is just exemplifying how in specific situations having a gun with you drastically changes how you are perceived.
No, it's a completely absurd analogy that doesn't even begin to make sense.
It does: in context of an active war having a gun won't surprise anyone. In context of arresting someone and seeing a gun on that person makes that person appear lethally dangerous.
1 reply →